Miguel Mitrofanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I understand it Haskell does not specify an order of evaluation > > and it would therefore be a mistake to write a program which relies > > on a particular evaluation order. This is the 'unsafe' aspect of > > unsafePerformIO. > > Hmm... IMHO unsafePerformIO is 'unsafe' because it can lead to type > errors in runtime. At least, that seems to be much more dangerous. > Nope. That'd be unsafeCoerce#, which you never heard of, and I did not mention it in this post. Go away. This is not the function you are looking for.
-- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying, hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
