On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Antoine Latter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neal, those two profiling results aren't really comparable, because > your Parsec2 profiling doesn't include any cost-centers from the > Parsec library - so all of the costs associated with Parsec2 will be > assigned to cost-centers in EQ2Parse.
Self-reply: Or is it possible that Parsec2 is so much faster that it doesn't even show up in the .prof results? + The largest cost center in the Parsec2 results is the EQ2Parse function "until" + The largest cost center in the Parsec3 result is the Parsec function "manyTill", which (in the prof results) is only called by "until" in EQ2Parse. Which is consistent with my previous reasoning, at least. Antoine _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
