Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > Peter Gavin: >> will work if the non-taken branch can't be unified with anything. Is >> this planned? Is it even feasible? > > I don't think i entirely understand the question.
Maybe he wants, given cond :: Cond x y z => x -> y -> z tt :: True true_exp :: a false_exp :: <<<untypable>>> that cond tt true_exp false_exp :: a That is the type of false_exp is "lazily inferred", so that type errors do not make inference fail if they show up in an unneeded place. If we had subtyping, typing that as Top would suffice, I believe. Zun. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
