On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Loup Vaillant wrote: >> 2008/6/3 Darrin Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> <--cut--> >>> What's the appeal of this? I personally love git, but I thought all >>> the cool kids at this school used darcs and that was that. >> >> Disclaimer: I'm no expert, this is what I've heard. Anyone please >> confirm or deny the following? >> >> Basically, git is waaay faster than Darcs on a number of use cases. > > Other reason can be "git rebase". Of course there is a question > how good practice it is ... but it is being used.
Darcs patches are pretty much an implicit rebase. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
