The naming of cats is a difficult matter...
Ahem. So as you may have noticed, we seem to have a profusion of
packages all called "binary" or something dangeriously similar. There's
also several "MD5" packages. I could point out a few others. So what I'm
wondering is... Do we have a formal convention for the naming of
packages and/or the naming of the modules they contain? How are name
collisions supposed to be avoided? (E.g., Java uses domain names for
this. If I write a package named Foo, I put all the classes in
orphi.me.uk.Foo.*)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
