2008/8/20, Jason Dusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What's the Haskeller friendly paper?
This version of the paper was submitted to ICFP this year (and was rejected): http://perso.eleves.bretagne.ens-cachan.fr/~dagand/opis/icfp_paper.pdf In the technical report, we tried to address ICFP reviewers' comments. Sadly for us haskellers, a reviewer was strongly opposed to the use of Haskell to present a project in OCaml. That's why we decided to only use OCaml in the technical report. The core Arrow implementation and the structure of launchers did not changed a lot. However, we corrected the definition of timers to be simpler and fixed a problem with the random number embedding. Also, the term "multiplexer" in this paper corresponds to "launcher" in the technical report. My adviser did not liked the word "multiplexer". If people here are interested in an Haskell-Opis (HOpis ?), I would gladly put my current Haskell implementation on a public repository and start translating the OCaml code in Haskell. Regards, -- Pierre-Evariste DAGAND http://perso.eleves.bretagne.ens-cachan.fr/~dagand/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
