magnus: > Sorry for not responding earlier but I didn't pay attention to this > thread at the time. The reason for finding it now is that I listened > to the FLOSS Weekly's episode on CouchDB yesterday; I stumbled on this > email from a search for haskell+couchdb. > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dimitry Golubovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 4. The dataenc package (http://code.haskell.org/dataenc/devo/) from > > which I pulled the Codec.Binary.Base64 module. The package may need > > some adjustment to GHC 6.8.x packages structure as only "base" listed > > in build-depends does not seem to be enough: when building it, Cabal > > complains for hidden packages such as collections (which I had to add > > manually to the cabal file), etc. Is it some problem with my GHC > > setup, or does just the dataenc.cabal need to be updated? > > As the author of dataenc I'm interested in fixing any problems you see > with it. Maybe you could offer some more information: > > 1. Is this still a problem? (I'm using GHC 6.8.2 and I'm having no > such problems at the moment.) > 2. What can I do to make sure that I get contacted if similar issues > come up in the future? (Currently bugs can only be reported by > contacting me directly, preferably via email. Since you didn't I > suspect I haven't communicated that clearly enough though.)
I think the best result here would be to put a CouchDB binding on hackage. Is anyone in a position to do this? -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
