On Sun 2008-08-24 11:03, Thomas M. DuBuisson wrote: > Yay, the multicore version pays off when the workload is non-trivial. > CPU utilization is still rather low for the -N2 case (70%). I think the > Haskell threads have an affinity for certain OS threads (and thus a > CPU). Perhaps it results in a CPU having both tokens of work and the > other having none?
This must be obvious to everyone but the original thread-ring cannot possibly be faster with multiple OS thread since a thread can only be running if it has the token, otherwise it is just blocked on the token. If there are threads executing simultaneously, the token must at least be written to the shared cache if not to main memory. With the single threaded runtime, the token may never leave L1. The difference between -threaded -N1 and -nothreaded may be influenced by the effectiveness of prefetching the next thread (since presumably not all 503 threads can reside in L1). Jed
pgpTHzoRbspOi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
