If I do foo and foo-test, then I would probably place foo-test on Hackage. Alternatively, just give foo a pointer to the location of the foo-test darcs repo location. But then it might not be easy for users to keep the versions in sync.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Wolfgang Jeltsch < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. September 2008 16:05 schrieb Conal Elliott: > > […] > > > > > My current leaning is to split a package "foo" into packages "foo" > > > > and "foo-test" > > > > > > What benefit does this provide? > > > > It keeps the library and its dependencies small. > > Do you publish foo-test on Hackage? If yes than the HackageDB gets > cluttered > with test packages. If not, there is no easy way for users to run your > tests. > > > […] > > Best wishes, > Wolfgang > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe