> I believe this was voiced as an SML issue more than an OCaml issue, though
> honestly I don't know enough of the differences to distinguish them. Before
> I mentioned that function/prefix application always binds tighter than
> operator/infix application, he was using many redundant parentheses, thanks
> to defensive programming against whichever dialect was at fault.
It was apparently a programmer issue rather than a language issue: SML's
precedence rules are pretty much identical to Haskell's in this regard.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
