> I believe this was voiced as an SML issue more than an OCaml issue, though > honestly I don't know enough of the differences to distinguish them. Before > I mentioned that function/prefix application always binds tighter than > operator/infix application, he was using many redundant parentheses, thanks > to defensive programming against whichever dialect was at fault.
It was apparently a programmer issue rather than a language issue: SML's precedence rules are pretty much identical to Haskell's in this regard. Stefan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe