Magnus Therning wrote:
I've heard that the OCaml crowd uses a modified LGPL with a static
linking exception. Unfortunately I've also heard that their addition
to LGPL hasn't gotten much review by lawyers, I'd much rather use
something that feels less ad hoc, if you get what I mean.
Any suggestions?
I don't know of any "officially sanctioned" licenses that have this
property, but I'd just like to call for the LGPL + static linking
exception license to be made more visible by putting it on the wiki
somewhere, or perhaps including it as an option for the license field in
Cabal. We need to publicise the fact that complying with the LGPL is
difficult in the context of Haskell, and give people a way to easily
work around it.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
