On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 08:16 -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:08 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to thank everyone who replied to my OP, and also > perhaps > clarify one point. I wasn't trying to be argumentative or > negative > about any work people have done to make Haskell approachable > for OO > programmers (or any other programmers, for that matter). I > simply > wanted to know what others thought about one item that was > misleading > to me in particular, and to see if others either agreed with > me or had > similar experiences. > > That being said, I know that it's a great deal of work to put > together > a useful tutorial, and I appreciate every one I read. > Especially the > monad tutorials, of which it took a half dozen before I got > it. > > > I've read a lot of the Monad tutorials, and I feel like I only get "most of > it" to be 100% honest.
Maybe the problem isn't you, but what you are reading... > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
