-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:43:27 -0500
"Gwern Branwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darn! I was really hoping to analyze my XMonadContrib modules which use
> CPP. :(
>
> Come now, is it really so intractable? Why not try a dumb, but simple
> and understandable approach - like dropping everything inside CPP
> sections, and analysing the remainder? If it's clearly stated in the
> docs, I don't think any user could really blame you. If they insist,
> you could always add a flag like --strict-cpp ('So you prefer no
> results to somewhat wrong results? FINE.')
The main reason I haven't is due to lack of time... as it was, these last few
fix-ups were only done last-minute whilst I was waiting for my supervisor to
read through my draft (and mainly fixed what I perceived as _real_ bugs, not
just adding functionality). Though, to be honest I didn't think about
performing sanitizing in that fashion...
Of course, if you really want that functionality you can add it ;-)
- --
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkOdBkACgkQfEfFJ9JhvyhjYgCggEcRquF+BmZSCkVpxt3dY1sT
pI4AnjV5em0zVrTxHQtdf2J6ibOZ121d
=qd3I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
