Hi all, On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:38, Dave Tapley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Usually I'll avoid then question and explain that it is a 'complete' > language and we do have more than enough libraries to make it useful and > productive. But I'd be keen to know if people have any anecdotes, > ideally ones which can subsequently be twisted into an argument for > Haskell ;)
I would not use Haskell if I were faced with the prospect of producing a huge system in short time (i.e. meaning I couldn't do it by myself) and all I had was a pool of "regular" programmers that have been trained in .NET, Java, C++, Python, <your favorite imperative language>. Yes, sad - but true. I'd very much like to see this twisted to an argument for Haskell :) cheers, Arnar _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
