"Tim Docker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> My apologies for side-tracking, but does anybody have performance >> numbers for STM? I have an application waiting to be written using >> STM, boldly parallelizing where no man has parallelized before, but >> if it doesn't make it faster,
> Faster than what? Faster than an equivalent non-concurrent program. It'd also be nice if performance was comparable lock-based implementation. > Are you considering using STM just to make otherwise pure code run in > parallel on multiple cores? No, I have a complex structure that must be updated in non-predictable ways. That's what STM is for, no? -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
