Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Dusek wrote: > > In the ticket, someone says: > > > > True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the > > uninitiated. We know to read the conditional syntax as an > > implication constraint which can be applied in either > > direction but I suspect many people read it in a directed > > functional way. > > > > Does that mean you don't have to actually set 'splitBase' > > explicitly? > > No, that is the point. You do not have to. The choice for the > flag is completely determined automatically by the version of > the base package that is chosen.
When you say "chosen" is that the same as "detected"? With 6.10, both versions of base are available -- what happens then? The environment chooses the latest one? -- _jsn _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe