as some german right-hegelian thinkers of the beginning of the 20th century noticed, the hegelian system is missing what we call 'action'. the whole system can be described as a timeless and closed set of invariant relations between parts of the world, which can also be seen as gods thinking. this critique is similar to the marxist turn of the hegelian philosophy.

now, thinking of an timeless set of invariant relations, that should be extended by some concept of action, reminds me of haskell's monads. so I would say, haskell is not a revolutionary movement itself, its just a (or: THE) vehicle of the revolutionary progress that started 200 years ago (some might say, 2000 years ago). it's the place where the 'spirit of the world' comes to itself in these days...

just kidding.

daniel

Jonathan Cast schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 20:38 +0000, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
I think of Haskell more as a revolutionary movement
LOL! Longest revolution EVER, eh?

No.

Das Kapital publication 1867.
Russian Revolution 1917.

FTW.

jcc


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-caf
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to