> Oh, but JSON doesn't seem to support tree-structured data... { "value" : 5, "left" : { "value" : 3, "left" : null, "right" : null }, "right" : { "value" : 8, "left" : null, "right" : null } }
JSON *is* tree structured data. /jve On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Belka <lambda-be...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > Thanks for the info! > > > These days, however, web services seem to be moving towards a RESTful > model with a JSON layer and there are plenty of JSON libraries on > hackage, which you could just throw over the fastCGI bindings. > > Oh, but JSON doesn't seem to support tree-structured data... This might > turn > into hell, when highly demanded in big infrastructures with complex > communications. That's why I guess my choise will be XML. Don't know any > good alternative with total support on every platform. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Haskell%2C-successing-crossplatform-API-standart-tp20742743p21067779.html > Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe