I always thought that instead of having two classes of characters, one for variable (and function) names and the other for operators, only the first charater of the identifier could mean it's one or the others, so *vec or +point would be valid operator names and thus >_> too. And C++ could be a Data type name...
Cheers, Thu 2009/1/11 Jason Dusek <jason.du...@gmail.com>: > It is really too bad we can not define the operators > > >_> ^_^ <_< > > These are significant from an internationalization standpoint; > and they'd make the language so much more competitiveI > vis-a-vis LOLCode. > > -- > Jason Dusek > > > > 2009/1/10 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <allb...@ece.cmu.edu>: >> On 2009 Jan 10, at 15:19, Peter Verswyvelen wrote: >> >> h3 x = f x <^(+)^> g x >> >> Is that an operator or Batman? >> (yes, I know, 3 operators) >> -- >> brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com >> system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu >> electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
