"Lennart Augustsson" <lenn...@augustsson.net> writes: > By no means do I suggest that Wikipedia should replace Haskell library > documentation. > I think the libraries should be documented in a mostly stand-alone way > (i.e., no references to old papers etc.). In the case of Monoid, a > few lines of text is enough to convey the meaning of it and gives an > example.
I don't think references to old papers are a bad thing (they might be good papers), but such references should certainly not be a replacement for a brief explanation and helpful example! _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
