ross: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 09:12:32PM -0500, a...@spamcop.net wrote: > > And FWIW, I agree with everyone who has commented that the documentation > > is inadequate. It'd be nice if there was some way to contribute better > > documentation without needing checkin access to the libraries. > > There is. The current state of the docs may be viewed at > > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/libraries/ > > Anyone can check out the darcs repos for the libraries, and post > suggested improvements to the documentation to librar...@haskell.org > (though you have to subscribe). It doesn't even have to be a patch. > > Sure, it could be smoother, but there's hardly a flood of contributions.
I imagine if we set up a wiki-like system where the entire hackage docs could be edited, as well as viewed, we would end up with a flood. A modification to haddock perhaps, that sends edits to generated docs to libraries@ ? -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
