Achim Schneider wrote: > > So what's left of those TK's if we don't use their abstractions and > replace them with Haskell? Drawing and layouting, that's what's > left[3]. Both, IMNSHO, do not justify carrying around bloaty external > dependencies, they're too trivial. They certainly don't justify using > unsafePerformIO to hide foreign side effects and the headaches > associated with it. > > > So, if you don't mind, I'm going to stop trying to fit cubes into > round holes and gonna use reactive and fieldtrip[4] to do things. >
Does this mean you're volunteering to create a fieldtrip-based toolkit with widgets and layout? John Lato _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
