On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Don Stewart wrote:
andrewcoppin:
Jochem Berndsen wrote:
The HAppS project has been abandoned, see
http://groups.google.com/group/HAppS/msg/d128331e213c1031 .
The Happstack project is intended to continue development. For more
details, see http://happstack.com/faq.html .
So we've got HAppS, Happstack, WASH, Turbinado, probably others... Does
anybody know how all these relate to each other? Where their strengths
and weaknesses lie?
It's nice to have choice, but without knowing what you're choosing
between, it's hard to use it well.
A comparative analysis of the 10+ Haskell web frameworks would be
awesome.
happstack, wash, fastcgi.., turbinado, perpubplat, riviera, salvia,
kibro, ella, what was that one launched yesterday? *ah, yesod...
I'm afraid that
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Applications_and_libraries/Web_programming
has become less important since all people upload their stuff to Hackage
and get automatically indexed and visible this way. However this Wiki page
could be used by Web framework authors to advertise their frameworks, read
how other authors advertise their work and adapt the own advertising
accordingly.
This might work like:
"My framework can do X, but I didn't mention it, because I thought it is
trivial. However since the others find X important, I'll add that to my
feature list, too."
"I see others support Y. I never thought about that. I'll add it to my
ToDo list."
"I see others solve problem X the way Y, where I thought my way Z would
be the only one. So I'll mention that I solve it by Z and why I did not
choose Y.")
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
