Robin Green wrote:
I think we can fairly safely discount the commercial relevance of any language ranking which places LOGO so highly. It may be that a lot of people *know* LOGO (or claim to know it), but that does not mean that is used a lot for commercial programming.
If we discuss here about a new Haskell LOGO - does this also count as a hit for LOGO programming language?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
