Hello Louis, Saturday, February 21, 2009, 4:16:10 AM, you wrote:
> In the meantime, a brief summary: a minor correction: the best gcc result shown in the thread was 50x faster than Don's one, so you need to miltiple all ratios by a factor of 50 > Straightforward and simple Haskell code, written by an individual > aware of issues with tail recursion and stream fusion, is frequently > within 3x the speed of GCC code when compiled with appropriate > optimizations in GHC. yes, within 150x margin > When performance is an absolute necessity, > Haskell code can sometimes be manually modified (e.g. with manual > loop unrolls) to equal GCC in performance. yes, to make it only 50x slower while being only 7 times larger (i mean source lines) > Can we move on? yes, we can! :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
