Hello Eugene, Friday, February 27, 2009, 4:42:03 PM, you wrote:
> I'm exactly basing on them, but they don't have at least these things: "them" means Edison or Collections typeclasses? > - Treatment for unboxed types (I don't know yet, whether it is > needed; but why do STUArrays have special treatment then?) imho, this doesn't need its own typeclass > Actually, it started with me writing a monad-mutable hashtable and > thinking about what its interface should be, so probably I should just > upload the hashtable to hackage as is and look what comes next :) what are the differences against Data.Hashtable? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
