>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <co...@colina.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>>>> "Gwern" == Gwern Branwen <gwe...@gmail.com> writes:
Gwern> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Colin Paul Adams
Gwern> <co...@colina.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Having just read the Haddock manual , I am haddocking (may I
>>> copyleft that verb?) my code.
>>>
>>> But half-way through this data type, I discover that haddock
>>> rejects my non-haddock comments, although GHC is fine:
>>> How can I document the components of each constructor?
Gwern> http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/60 ?
Colin> That seems to be a different bug - my haddock comments are
Colin> accepted fine - it's the plain Haskell ones (no ^) that it
Colin> complains about as a parse error.
No, I'm wrong - it does seem to be the same problem.
Since the ticket has been downgraded to a minor problem, it seems the
Haddock team doesn't want to allow documentation of components, except
when they are named fields.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
