Doh, yes, of course. I had a feeling I was missing something obvious :)
Thanks :)
On 4 Mar 2009, at 17:29, Miguel Mitrofanov wrote:
Isn't that "sequence" in State monad?
On 4 Mar 2009, at 19:37, Edsko de Vries wrote:
Hi,
Does this function remind anybody of anything? It seems like I'm
missing an obvious abstraction:
composeWriter :: [a -> (a, b)] -> a -> (a, [b])
composeWriter [] a
= (a, [])
composeWriter (f:fs) a
= let (a', b) = f a
(final_a, bs) = composeWriter fs a'
in (final_a, b:bs)
It's almost but not quite composition for functions in the Writer
monad; the difference is that every function has exactly one b
result, rather than a list of them.
Edsko
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
