Hello Sebastian, Monday, March 9, 2009, 1:08:50 PM, you wrote:
i think we should make 2-stage voting, like in F1 after 1st stage we will know which logos are most popular and therefore are real candidates, so we can select among them > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Ashley Yakeley <ash...@semantic.org> wrote: > > Eelco Lempsink wrote: > > The list with options can be found here (for now): > http://community.haskell.org/~eelco/poll.html Notice that some > (very) similar logos are grouped as one option (thanks to Ian > Lynagh) All submissions compete, so that still makes more than a 100 options! > > The voting system we'll use is the Condorcet Internet Voting System > (http://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/civs.html). > So ranking all 100+ items on the Condorcet ballot is a bit of a > daunting task. However, if we get a rough idea of the favourites, we > can each cut down a bit on the work. > > For instance, suppose 82 and 93 are very popular. You might not > like either of them, but it's worth ranking them on your ballot > (after the ones you do like) if you have a preference between them. > But there's less need to rank the ones no-one likes. > > > > I'm pretty sure this is precisely how the system works. You bring > the ones you care about to the top and rank them, and everything > else shares a rank at the bottom (or you could pick a few of those > that you really dislike and put them even lower than the default > rank). But the point is that you shouldn't need to rank every single > logo, just the ones you care about and then you leave the rest at the default > rank. > -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe