xj2106: > Alexander Dunlap <alexander.dun...@gmail.com> writes: > > > - uvector, storablevector and vector are all designed for dealing with > > arrays. They *can* be used for characters/word8s but are not > > specialized for that purpose, do not deal with Unicode at all, and are > > probably worse at it. They are better for dealing with things that you > > would generally use arrays for. > > I think uvector only works with certain types that can be > unboxed, while storablevector works with all types that > instantiate Foreign.Storable.Storable. I don't know about > vector. From the description of vector, I have the
That's interesting. I'd expect Storable and UA to have the same set of inhabitants. Is there any difference? > impression that it is quite unstable. How is it compared to > uvector and storablevector? I need one of those to work > with my code to possibly improve the efficiency. But I > can't use uvector, because I can't use unboxed types. Hmm? If you can write a Storable instance, you can write a UA instance. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
