safeDiv :: (Exception e, Integral a) => a -> a -> Either e a safeDiv x y = unsafePerformIO . try . evaluate $ div x yI just want to know, from a theoretical point of view, whether this 'safeDiv' in above definition is the same assafeDiv' :: (Exception e, Integral a) => a -> a -> Either e a safeDiv' _ 0 = Left e safeDiv' x y = Right $ div x y
No. Firstly, safeDiv' doesn't compile!-) Then, if you replace 'e' by 'DivideByZero' and adjust the types: *Main> safeDiv 1 (throw Overflow) Left arithmetic overflow *Main> safeDiv' 1 (throw Overflow) *** Exception: arithmetic overflow Try ':info ArithException' for more in the same group. You could use other functions in Control.Exceptions to get more control about which exceptions you want to handle and how, but so far, there is no indication that 'unsafePerformIO' is the right hammer to use here.. Claus -- unsagePerformIO: some things are just not wise to do _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
