On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Miguel Mitrofanov <miguelim...@yandex.ru>wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by that, but semantically IO is definitely >> *not* a state monad. Under any circumstances or any set of assumptions. >> > > Ehm? Why not? Mainly forkIO. There may be other reasons. Luke
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
