Hello Jon, Monday, April 20, 2009, 1:59:07 PM, you wrote:
> It's not an implementor's place to make such decisions -- > they can legitimately say "this feature sucks" and tell the > next Haskell committee so. If they care enough about it, > they can lobby or get on that next committee, but the > arguments for n+k patterns /in Haskell98/ were done long > ago. if you really believe in that you said, you can spend your own time adding its support :) i never seen n+k patterns in real code so i understand developers that don't want to waste time just to compliant standard even if their efforts will be never really used -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe