Richard O'Keefe wrote: >> Endusers, of course, might have other preferences, but cabal doesn't >> (IMHO) cater to them, directly: It caters to distribution packages (or >> windows installers, or whatever), so cabal's default behaviour is quite >> irrelevant for those cases. > > The clear impression I've received on this mailing list > is that cabal is _also_ for people who are using Haskell > and find that there's a new package reported in HWN that > they'd like to have. If you are now telling me that I > should ignore it because I'm not making distribution > packages or Windows installers, fine, just tell me what > to use instead.
distribution packages. Edward _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe