wagner.andrew: > So I've been reading a lot about a (relatively) new language called Clojure. > One of its goals is to make concurrency easier via a built-in home-grown STM. > Anyway, one of the ways it tries to do this is to have completely immutable > data structures. Every time I read a tutorial about this in Clojure, it says > "...yes, it sounds awful to think that your whole data structure gets copied > every time you want to make a change to it, but it's sane because of a > technique called structural sharing". Yet every time I hear immutability > talked > about in Haskell, what I hear is "...yes, it sounds awful to think that your > whole data structure gets copied every time you want to make a change to it, > but it's sane because of laziness...unless you need the whole data > structure...". So I'm just curious, does GHC use structural sharing or > something similar? Do other implementations? Does it matter?
Purity allows our data structures to have a lot of sharing. This is separate to laziness. Laziness lets us build up interesting structures that have unusual sharing. Actually, what kind of persistant structures does Clojure have at this stage? I was under the impression they were reusing Java data structures. E.g. some of the nicer ones on hackage are zippers, patricia tries, finger trees, which I can't imaging have been ported. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
