2009/5/24 <br...@lorf.org>: > Maybe most of the a.b people are thinking major.minor, and most of the > a.b.c people are thinking breaking.feature.implementation like the > "rational" RubyGems scheme described in > http://rubygems.org/read/chapter/7#page24 , but I don't know. It makes > it hard to describe dependencies. Will there be a standard versioning > scheme sometime?
We have one already: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy David _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
