Bulat Ziganshin schrieb: > actually, i don't have much problems with errrmsgs now, but trying to > grok how i interpret them i've found that i mainly use *position* > part of message, it's enough for me most times :)
I have heard the statement "users are only interested in the error position" in a talk 2007 in RISC in Hagenberg. But I still try to understand error messages. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe