On Saturday 30 May 2009 03:10:11 Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Bartosz Wójcik <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't undersdand what is being missed. > > Brevity. > > > liftM f m1 = do { x1 <- m1; return (f x1) } > > so > > liftM fromIntegral integer > > will result the same. > > Yes, and there's less code to read if you use liftM or <$>, hence fewer > moving parts to understand.
OK, thats clear. BTW: reading RWH I could not memorize what those liftM funtions meant. Best, Bartek _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
