On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Fernand<quarantedeu...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > but the parser one needs to write must parse ByteStrings instead of Strings > (that is, something like having a "Parsec Bytestring ()" type, unless I'm > completely misunderstanding the situation). My problem is that I do not > manage > to write primitive parsing combinators (like string, satisfy, letter, etc.) > to > define my language's tokens.
Why would you want to do that ? After all, those combinators are already available in Text.Parsec.Char : they work on any Stream instance whose token type is Char, which happens to be the case for ByteString. -- Jedaï _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
