I personally find
map maySwitch (unfoldr go (x1,y1,0)) and map maySwitch $ unfoldr go (x1,y1,0)
more intuitive.
I can read it as map the maySwitch function over the list generated from the
unfolding.
Is there any difference in the evaluation steps between the composition version
and the non-composition version?
Regards,
Kashyap
________________________________
From: david48 <dav.vire+hask...@gmail.com>
To: Ryan Ingram <ryani.s...@gmail.com>
Cc: Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com>; haskell-cafe@haskell.org; CK Kashyap
<ck_kash...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:56:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Need feedback on my Haskell code
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Ryan Ingram<ryani.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Read ($) as a parenthesis that extends as far to the right as
> possible; so you can write, for example:
That doesn't always work, for example :
map (+2) . map (*1) $ [1,2,3]
= [4,6,8]
Now replacing the $ by a parenthesis that extends as far to the right
as possible :
map (+2) . map (*1) ( [1,2,3] )
<interactive>:1:11:
Couldn't match expected type `a -> [a1]'
against inferred type `[a2]'
In the second argument of `(.)', namely `map (* 2) ([1, 2, 3])'
In the expression: map (+ 2) . map (* 2) ([1, 2, 3])
In the definition of `it': it = map (+ 2) . map (* 2) ([1, 2, 3])
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
