Can you elaborate on why Const is not a monad?
return x = Const x
fmap f (Const x) = Const (f x)
join (Const (Const x)) = Const x
What am I missing?
Tom Davie wrote:
Of note, there is a sensible monad instance for zip lists which I
*think* agrees with the Applicative one, I don't know why they're not
monads:
instance Monad (ZipList a) where
return = Ziplist . return
join (ZipList []) = ZipList []
join (ZipList (a:as)) = zlHead a `zlCons` join (map zlTail as)
I'll provide an alternative though, Const a is an applicative, but not a
monad.
Bob
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpic...@gmail.com
<mailto:ekirpic...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes. ZipList.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Applicative_Functors
2009/10/30 Yusaku Hashimoto <nonow...@gmail.com
<mailto:nonow...@gmail.com>>:
> Hello cafe,
> Do you know any data-type which is Applicative but not Monad?
>
> Cheers,
> -~nwn
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org <mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org>
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
--
Eugene Kirpichov
Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru <http://market.yandex.ru>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org <mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org>
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
