Tom Davie <tom.da...@gmail.com> writes: > On 10/31/09, Magicloud Magiclouds <magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> After all, I never think OO as an oppsite way to all other things. The >> idea is so general that if you say I cannot use it in Haskell at all, >> that would make me feel weird. The only difference between languages >> is, some are easy to be in OO style, some are not. > > Wow, someone drank the cool aid!
Doing OO-style programming in Haskell is difficult and unnatural, it's true (although technically speaking it is possible). That said, nobody's yet to present a convincing argument to me why Java gets a free pass for lacking closures and typeclasses. G. -- Gregory Collins <g...@gregorycollins.net> _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
