My impression is the saturated-ness that Doaitse speaks of is covered in Urban Boquist's phd thesis on the GRIN intermediate language - circa page 31.
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~boquist/phd/ As per the code snippet above Clean handles partial application entirely adequately. Best wishes Stephen >>> Doaitse Swierstra wrote: >>> >One of this differences between Haskell and Clean I did not see mentioned >>> >in >> this discussion is that Clean >>> does not allow so-called partial parametrisation. I.e. all function calls >>> have >> to be fully saturated _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
