Hello Christoph, I've been working on a SQL parser (http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hssqlppp) which might be useful for your project, although it might be a bit heavy weight (its feature scope getting more and more out of control...). Adding support for parsing ? placeholder statements is on my todo list, I could bump it up to the top if that would be useful to you.
Also, have you checked out MetaHDBC (http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/MetaHDBC). I think it has similar goals to your project. 2009/11/13 Colin Paul Adams <co...@colina.demon.co.uk>: > Why would hesql be an improvement for me? It sounds like several steps > backwards? The last few paragraphs on this page http://lindstroem.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/metahdbc-paper-draft/ (comment dated November 4, 2008 at 9:31 pm, starting with 'Second, MetaHDBC is a thin layer above a DBMS, as compared to ...') give some reasons why an approach like this might sometimes be preferred to a haskelldb-like approach, different situations can recommend one or the other. Thanks, Jake Wheat _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe