On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Gregory Crosswhite [..] > If Pandoc is LGPL, then I think that means we are dealing with an entirely > different situation, one in which the library user can choose whatever > license he or she likes for his or her own code as long as any modifications > to the LGPL'd library itself are released under the LGPL.
As has been discussed a few times before on this list, using LGPL for Haskell modules has its own set of problems when using GHC, due to the current state of linking in that compiler. From what I've read we're on a path to salvation with 6.12, but we're still not at the destination. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
