Am I the only one who finds this stuff confusing as hell?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Robert Greayer <robgrea...@gmail.com> wrote: > The crux here is that the source code of hakyll, released on hackage, is not > a derivative of Pandoc (it contains, as far as I understand it, no Pandoc > source code). A compiled executable *is* a derivative of Pandoc, so anyone > who *distributes* a compiled executable would need to make *all* the source > available under the GPL (including the hakyll source). Since the hakyll > package is released under BSD3, this would be allowed (AIUI, IANAL). _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
