> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Tom Tobin <korp...@korpios.com> wrote: > > The crux here is that the source code of hakyll, released on hackage, is not > a derivative of Pandoc (it contains, as far as I understand it, no Pandoc > source code). A compiled executable *is* a derivative of Pandoc, so anyone > who *distributes* a compiled executable would need to make *all* the source > available under the GPL (including the hakyll source). Since the hakyll > package is released under BSD3, this would be allowed (AIUI, IANAL). > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
To add to this thought: if the author releases hakyll under the BSD3 license, then even though programs using it *presently* must be licensed under the GPL since Pandoc is, if the Pandoc license were one day changed to BSD3, or hakyll patched to use a different BSD3-compatable API, then at that point programs using it could be licensed under BSD3. Cheers, Greg
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
