Stephen Tetley wrote: > If there are compelling uses that aren't covered by pexports and would > ease Haskell C binding problems on Windows, I don't mind polishing up > my tool, but otherwise I've exhausted my natural interest.
I think the main problem you'll face is that pexports is a windows only tool. If cabal can be made to use pexports on windows and something else on Unix then that should be ok. If you expect people writing Haskell bindings in Unix to jump though hoops to hook pexports into a windows specific build, you are heading for disappointment :-). Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
