2009/12/29 Dominic Steinitz <domi...@steinitz.org>: > And oo = (.).(.) and ooo = (.).(.).(.) > > There was a suggestion a few years back to standardise these as I recall > something like: > > $0 = $ > $1 = . > $2 = (.).(.) > > and so on but nothing came of it.
Hi Dominic Hmm, name-wise I would have to be dishonourable and vote for myself on this particular one. But, I rather suspect that Haskell-prime-prime (or whatever it gets called in a few years time) will bite the bullet and go for Unicode symbols, otherwise we'll be doomed to programs that look somewhat 'expletive-deleted'. Best wishes Stephen _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
