Andrew Coppin <andrewcop...@btinternet.com> wrote: > Ozgur Akgun wrote: > > A humble suggestion: Have a *lazy* "to list" method for > > your /lists, arrays, sets, etc./ and use the nice list-only version. > > Yeah, that works quite nicely. > > It won't work for arbitrarily complex structures, however. My main > point was that if you make the constructors abstract and provide > functions to query the structure, now you can't pattern match against > it. > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3583
...I think the issue just has to be nailed down precisely, and then someone has to volunteer implementing it. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe